Webtrends Tracking Code
 
UK Home >  OUT-LAW News >  News Archive >  2000 >  October 2000 >  US appeals court rules against anonymous comments on-line

US appeals court rules against anonymous comments on-line

OUT-LAW News, 17/10/2000

A Florida appeals court yesterday upheld a ruling that ISPs must divulge the identities of those who post defamatory messages on the internet.

A former shipping company executive, J. Erik Hvide, claimed he was libelled on financial message boards hosted by Yahoo! and AOL. The companies themselves were not sued. The reason is that earlier court rulings in the US protect ISPs from responsibility for messages posted on their sites. Instead, Hvide sued anonymous individuals who claimed he had been guilty of mismanagement and criminal behaviour. The court papers referred only to “John Doe”.

At the time of the district court’s ruling on this case, AOL and Yahoo! were ordered to identify the eight responsible individuals. It appears that this order was appealed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) which sought to protect the identities of those involved.

The ACLU argued that the court should first rule on whether Hvide have been defamed before naming those who made the comments. However, the court disagreed, apparently without explaining its reasoning. The ACLU is said to be considering whether to appeal.

See also:

 

OUT-LAW Recommends

Data Protection training
We offer training courses on Data Protection and Freedom of Information laws

Winner at 2008 Webby Awards

OUT-LAW star: link to the home page
Disclaimer: This was printed from OUT-LAW.COM, a service of international law firm Pinsent Masons. We hope you find this content useful. However, please note that nothing in this document constitutes specific legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. Any questions, please email info@out-law.com.