Webtrends Tracking Code
 
UK Home >  OUT-LAW News >  News Archive >  2001 >  May 2001 >  Flower delivery dot.com loses UK trade mark appeal

Flower delivery dot.com loses UK trade mark appeal

OUT-LAW News, 18/05/2001

A major US on-line flower delivery service has been told by a UK court that it cannot register 1-800 FLOWERS as a trade mark because the number is not distinctive of its business and also it did not own the equivalent free UK phone number. Use of the name on a US-based web site was not considered use in the UK for the purposes of the application.

In the US, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM is a leading provider of flowers and gifts and 1-800-FLOWERS is one of the country’s most recognised brands in that market. The numeric equivalent of the order number was 1-800 356 3977. In the UK, the holder of the equivalent free-phone number, 0800 356 3977, was a company called Phonenames.

The UK company objected to the application by 1-800 FLOWERS for a UK trade mark since Phonenames used the number for a franchised business of selling flowers. Originally, the trade mark registrar allowed the US company its trade mark. Phonenames challenged that decision in court and won, thereby rejecting 1-800 FLOWERS as a trade mark. The judge ruled that trade mark laws could not apply where a web site was not addressing the whole world but only a local clientele. He added:

"Although it was possible to access the US site from the UK and order flowers, the service was carried out wholly in New York. If the applicant had a reputation here it was goodwill in a US-based business. Anyone here who knew of '1-800 FLOWERS' would expect service under that mark to be carried out in the US. It by no means followed that anyone here knowing of the applicants or their US number would think that the use of the UK number was by the same or a connected enterprise."

The US company then appealed, without success.

The higher court held that the original judge was correct to reject the claim by 1-800 FLOWERS because its use of the mark, without having the UK 0800 number, “would inevitably lead to confusion, if not also deception.” He also doubted that the US company had the intention to use the mark in the UK.

 

 

OUT-LAW Recommends

Data Protection training
We offer training courses on Data Protection and Freedom of Information laws

Winner at 2008 Webby Awards

OUT-LAW star: link to the home page
Disclaimer: This was printed from OUT-LAW.COM, a service of international law firm Pinsent Masons. We hope you find this content useful. However, please note that nothing in this document constitutes specific legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. Any questions, please email info@out-law.com.