Webtrends Tracking Code
 
UK Home >  OUT-LAW News >  News Archive >  2002 >  January 2002 >  Network Solutions “screwed up” sex.com dispute

Network Solutions "screwed up" sex.com dispute

OUT-LAW News, 25/01/2002

A US appeals court was yesterday asked to hold Network Solutions responsible for mismanaging a dispute over the domain name sex.com. The Virginia-based registry, now owned by VeriSign, transferred the name after receiving a forged request.

The sex.com case is one of the internet's longest running and most bizarre domain name disputes. For obvious reasons, the domain name is one of the most valuable addresses on the web.

Sex.com was originally registered by Gary Kremen of San Francisco in 1994. The following year, Stephen Cohen, an ex-convict, took the name from Kremen by sending a forged letter of transfer to Network Solutions. Cohen then ran a highly profitable porn portal until November 2000 when a court awarded Kremen the return of the domain name having found that the forged signature on the letter to Network Solutions misspelled Kremen's name.

A Californian district court ordered Cohen to pay the sum of $65 million in damages to Kremen. However, Cohen has to date paid nothing. He was last seen in Tijuana, Mexico and his assets are thought to be tied up in offshore bank accounts. Accordingly, Kremen is instead seeking redress from Network Solutions.

In 2000, a lower court ruled that NSI, which is the sole domain name registry for .com domain names, is immune from civil suit in cases where it negligently handled a domain name. Kremen's company, Sex.com, which owns the name, then appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Civil liberties group the Electronic Frontier Foundation has filed a brief in the case in support of the action against the registry.

"A court has ruled that NSI can screw up its monopoly on dot.com domain name management and face no consequence for its actions," said the Foundation's intellectual property lawyer Robin Gross. "We hope the appellate court will recognise the danger in eliminating all accountability for this key component of internet governance."

Kremen added, "Everyone reasonably assumes the registrar will prevent poaching of domain names. It's time the law backed that up."

See also:

 

OUT-LAW star: link to the home page
Disclaimer: This was printed from OUT-LAW.COM, a service of international law firm Pinsent Masons. We hope you find this content useful. However, please note that nothing in this document constitutes specific legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. Any questions, please email info@out-law.com.