Webtrends Tracking Code
 
UK Home >  OUT-LAW News >  News Archive >  2002 >  July 2002 >  US judge orders Gator to stop displaying pop-up ads

US judge orders Gator to stop displaying pop-up ads

OUT-LAW News, 15/07/2002

A US federal judge has ordered Gator, a software and behavioural marketing company, to temporarily stop placing pop-up advertisements on certain web sites without permission. The temporary injunction was granted on Friday, in a lawsuit filed against Gator by 10 publishers, including the Washington Post, The New York Times and Dow Jones.

The publishers claimed that Gator was infringing their copyright and stealing their revenue by selling pop-up ads that appeared when users of the company’s software visited their web sites.

The publishers have asked for a permanent injunction, damages and the return of Gator’s revenue from the ads. In the suit, the publishers have characterised Gator as a “parasite on the web that free rides on the hard work and the investments [of the publishers] and other web site owners.”

Gator’s software manages passwords and fills out application forms for about 22 million internet users. The company also produces software that monitors web surfers’ behaviour and delivers targeted pop-up ads. The software allows surfers to view a company’s advertisement while they are visiting a competitor’s web site.

Last month, WeightWatchers won a case against rival DietWatch.com, that was using Gator to deliver ads to visitors of WeightWatchers.com. Also, Gator has been criticised by the Interactive Advertising Bureau for selling banner ads that obscure those sold by on-line publishers.

A spokesman for the publishers said: “This is only a first step in the legal process, but it sends a clear signal that the [publishers] are likely to succeed on the merits of their claims against Gator.”

Gator stated that, since the injunction only bans placing ads on certain publishers’ web sites, it will continue business “as usual.”

Gator CEO, Jeff McFadden, said:

“We are highly confident that once all the facts are presented in the upcoming trial - no Court will issue a ruling eliminating consumers' right to decide for themselves what is displayed on their own computer screens. Such a ruling would attack a consumer's right to use hundreds of popular software applications that automatically display separate windows while the consumer is surfing the internet.”

“This flies in the face of the very nature of the Windows operating system and is ridiculous. It would mean that AOL Instant Messenger, Microsoft Outlook and dozens of other software applications that automatically display information in separate windows are illegal.”

See also:

 

OUT-LAW Recommends

Free OUT-LAW seminars
- Making your contract work
- Information security
Six cities, October & November

This week's podcast
Are ISPs about to betray our trust?

Winner at 2008 Webby Awards

OUT-LAW star: link to the home page
Disclaimer: This was printed from OUT-LAW.COM, a service of international law firm Pinsent Masons. We hope you find this content useful. However, please note that nothing in this document constitutes specific legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. Any questions, please email info@out-law.com.