Webtrends Tracking Code
 
UK Home >  OUT-LAW News >  News Archive >  2002 >  October 2002 >  Netscape arbitration clause is invalid, says US court

Netscape arbitration clause is invalid, says US court

OUT-LAW News, 02/10/2002

A panel of the US Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit has ruled that Netscape users are not bound by a clickwrap licence agreement forcing them to resolve disputes via arbitration, according to a report by CNet news.

Netscape Communications, now a unit of AOL, was sued by customers alleging that the SmartDownload software was privacy-intrusive and violated electronic surveillance laws by monitoring internet users’ moves.

AOL abandoned the tracking feature of SmartDownload after being sued. However, it also claimed that its customers could not bring court proceedings because they had accepted an arbitration-only clause in the end-user licence agreement.

According to CNet, the court rejected AOL’s argument, reasoning that the terms of the agreement were presented on the web page below the download button. Therefore users who obtained SmartDownload had not received “reasonable notice” of the terms of the agreement.

The court also confirmed an earlier decision, ruling that the agreement in dispute did not cover SmartDownload anyway, because it was designed for Communicator.

Last month, another US court ruled that a PayPal clickwrap clause requiring users to go through arbitration proceedings in the event of a dispute was invalid.

See also:

 

OUT-LAW Recommends

Free OUT-LAW seminars
- Making your contract work
- Information security
Six cities, October & November

Winner at 2008 Webby Awards

OUT-LAW star: link to the home page
Disclaimer: This was printed from OUT-LAW.COM, a service of international law firm Pinsent Masons. We hope you find this content useful. However, please note that nothing in this document constitutes specific legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. Any questions, please email info@out-law.com.