Webtrends Tracking Code
 
UK Home >  OUT-LAW News >  News Archive >  2003 >  December 2003 >  Should ISPs pay music royalties for file-sharing by customers?

Should ISPs pay music royalties for file-sharing by customers?

OUT-LAW News, 05/12/2003

A landmark case came before the Supreme Court of Canada this week, with its music industry seeking an order for ISPs to pay royalties for file-sharing by their customers. In effect it wants a tax to compensate for what it cannot stop.

The music industry is fighting a desperate battle to control the unauthorised downloading of copyrighted music that leaves artists and recording companies bereft of their lucrative royalties. Peer-to-peer file-sharing services like KaZaA are seen as the biggest problem.

In the US, the Recording Industry Association of America has taken direct action against users of these services, and only this week sued 41 individuals in its latest wave of lawsuits. But the Canadian music industry is attempting a different approach.

On Wednesday, the Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada (SOCAN) went to the Supreme Court seeking an order that would force ISPs to pay blanket royalty fees to cover the music downloaded using their services as conduits.

SOCAN proposes that ISPs pay a royalty of CAN$0.25 per subscriber per year as well as 10% of any gross profit that ISPs make through the sale of advertising.

SOCAN also wants the court to decide whether or not ISPs should be accountable for web content hosted in other countries but accessed by Canadians.

The Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP), which counts IBM, AOL and Yahoo! among its members, is defending the action. CAIP argues that royalties should be sought from web site operators rather than ISPs, who were just being used as a convenient target.

The case revolves around the definition of an ISP: is it merely a conduit for the transportation of digital information, or is it actually communicating that information in some way that makes it responsible for the content?

No decision is expected until at the middle of next year at the earliest.

In Europe, the E-Commerce Directive defines ISPs as a mere conduit of information, meaning that in general an ISP is not liable for the material transferred among its customers or hosted their web sites.

See also:

 

OUT-LAW Recommends

Data Protection training
We offer training courses on Data Protection and Freedom of Information laws

Winner at 2008 Webby Awards

OUT-LAW star: link to the home page
Disclaimer: This was printed from OUT-LAW.COM, a service of international law firm Pinsent Masons. We hope you find this content useful. However, please note that nothing in this document constitutes specific legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. Any questions, please email info@out-law.com.