Dealing with consumers
This guide is based on UK law. There is an equivalent Hong Kong guide.
Overview
Much of the UK law relevant to e-commerce is only applicable to
businesses dealing with consumers. Depending on the area of law
concerned, the term "consumer" may include not only natural persons
but also partnerships and other unincorporated associations.
The various laws relating to consumers can lead to:
- Terms in contracts being unenforceable by
suppliers;
- Terms being implied into contracts;
- Contracts being voidable at the consumer's
discretion; or
- Suppliers incurring both civil and criminal
liability.
Who protects consumers?
Due to the relative expense of legal claims, consumers often do
not enforce their rights against suppliers. However, government
bodies and trade associations are increasingly active in developing
and enforcing consumer related regulation. These organisations
include:
- The Department of Trade and Industry –
responsible for policy on trading standards, fair trading, weights
and measures, consumer credit and consumer safety.
- The Office of Fair Trading – an
administrative agency which monitors and controls trade practices
and licences those traders whose area of business is subject to a
system of licences.
- Other Government Departments – the Home
Office has a role in relation to the control of firearms and
explosives, dangerous drugs and poisons, while the Department of
Health and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
are responsible for enforcement of Food Safety and Medicines
legislation.
- Local trading standards officers – most of
the consumer protection legislation is enforced by local trading
standards officers who are responsible for bringing prosecutions
for breaches of the law.
- Trade Associations – in many areas of
business Trade Associations will operate voluntary codes setting
out the way in which their members must deal with customers.
Compliance with these requirements often allows a supplier to
display a particular brand or mark on its promotional material or
website. These brands are intended to encourage consumer
confidence.
Contract terms and conditions
Many of the consumer rights described in this guide apply
regardless of any contract terms and conditions agreed by the
parties. However, suppliers are still advised to incorporate a set
of terms and conditions into their consumer sales, as large
sections of the terms will still apply and will help clarify each
party's rights and responsibilities. A set of terms and conditions
is also a useful place to satisfy many of the information
requirements detailed later in this guide.
Contract terms should clearly set out each party's rights and
responsibilities. This will help avoid disputes, with their
resultant costs and bad publicity. Suppliers should note that
ambiguous clauses are likely to be interpreted by courts in a way
which is favourable to the consumer.
When a consumer buys something on the internet, he or she
generally does not need to sign anything and might skip over the
supplier's terms and conditions or may not notice a link to those
terms. If a supplier wants to rely on its written terms it must be
able to show that it has done enough to draw the consumer's
attention to the terms.
Accordingly, a consumer should be required to acknowledge that
he or she has read and agrees to the terms as part of the
purchasing process.
Unfair Terms
A supplier will usually seek to specify in its written terms of
business that any liability to a purchaser is limited to a certain
amount. However, the Unfair Contract Terms Act
provides that:
- certain exclusion clauses are rendered totally
invalid; and
- other exclusion clauses are valid only if
they are considered reasonable.
Suppliers cannot exclude liability to anyone for death or bodily
injury caused by negligence, nor can they exclude certain other
duties to a consumer. Other exclusion clauses will only be
permitted if the court considers them to be reasonable. The burden
of proving that the exclusion clause is reasonable rests on the
supplier.
Courts have a wide discretion in deciding whether a clause is
reasonable. This decision will be made in light of all relevant
factors, which may include:
- the strength of the bargaining positions of the
parties;
- whether the consumer received an inducement to
agree to the terms; and
- whether the consumer knew or ought
reasonably to have known of the existence and extent of the
term.
The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations
1999 apply, with certain exceptions, to any contractual
term between a supplier and consumer which has not been
individually negotiated. Any such term found to be unfair under the
regulations will be void.
The regulations consider a term to be unfair if, "contrary to
the requirement of good faith, it causes a significant imbalance in
the parties' rights and obligations arising under the contract, to
the detriment of the consumer." This is not the clearest of
definitions. However, the regulations more helpfully provide some
examples of unfair terms, including those which:
- inappropriately exclude or limit the legal
rights of a consumer where the seller fails to satisfy its
contractual obligations (e.g. an unreasonable limitation of
liability clause); or
- enable the seller to unilaterally alter,
without a valid reason, any characteristics of the product or
service purchased.
The Office of Fair Trading
issues guidance on terms which it regards as unfair and
investigates unfair terms in consumer contracts, although an
individual consumer may also challenge a term. The OFT site also
publishes periodic bulletins on cases of unfair terms in consumer
contracts.
See also our guide on Using Exemption
Clauses in Web Sales.
The E-Commerce Regulations
The E-commerce Regulations came into force in the UK on 21st
August 2002, implementing the E-commerce Directive. These
regulations cover virtually every commercial web site and introduce
important provisions for the protection of consumers.
The regulations stipulate information that must be provided by
suppliers to their customers. This information includes the name,
address and corporate registration details of the supplier.
Additional requirements for selling on-line are also set out. These
include requirements to specify the technical steps required to
conclude a contract and provide an acknowledgement of orders
placed.
The regulations introduce into UK law the 'country of origin'
principle. This means that EU-based suppliers are only obliged to
comply with the laws of the particular EU country in which they are
based and should not be subject to additional requirements when
trying to sell goods in other EU countries. However, an exception
is provided to the country of origin rule in respect of consumer
contracts.
Consequently, EU consumers may continue to rely, against
suppliers from another country, on their own country's laws
concerning the quality and safety of goods, the unfairness of
contract terms and other specific consumer related regulation.
The country of origin rule is still of benefit to those selling
to consumers as rules regarding areas of corporate/administrative
compliance and sales promotion do not fall within the consumer
exception.
The Distance Selling Regulations
The Distance Selling Regulations apply when goods or services
are bought by consumers over the internet or by other remote means,
such as telesales. They only apply in sales to consumers. The
regulations detail information which must be provided to consumers
before and after any sale, such as price and the supplier's
details.
The regulations provide consumers with a cooling-off period.
This gives a consumer the right to withdraw from a contract within
7 working days, without penalty and without giving any reasons –
the consumer can simply have a change of mind about a purchase.
There are exceptions to the rule and other provisions worth
studying in more detail.
Product liability
Product liability can be divided into:
- liability for quality; and
- liability for safety.
These two areas do overlap.
Product quality is primarily governed by
contract law. If a product is sub-standard, the consumer can
usually claim against the retailer for, (a) any resulting personal
injury and damage to property; (b) a refund or, if they have been
using the product for some time, the cost of repair; and (c) any
other financial loss resulting from the product's poor quality.
Product safety law is governed by contract and
non-contract claims (including criminal law claims).
In the UK, goods must be reasonably safe, which means that the
risk of death or personal injury must be reduced to a minimum
taking into account what the product would be used for (e.g. a set
of kitchen knives will not be considered unsafe simply because they
are potentially dangerous if used incorrectly). A breach of this
general safety requirement under UK legislation may lead to damages
claims and, potentially, criminal prosecution. The general safety
requirement applies to manufacturers, distributors and
retailers.
A defence to such claims may be available where the producer,
distributor or retailer reasonably believed it was complying with
its safety obligations (e.g. because the available technology at
the time of manufacture of the goods did not allow a certain design
flaw to be identified).
Trade descriptions
The Trade Descriptions Act created two
offences:
- applying a false trade description to
goods in the course of a trade or business
- supplying or offering to supply in the
course of a trade or business any goods to which a false trade
description is applied
The offence could, therefore, be committed by an on-line
retailer merely applying a false trade description to goods which
appear on its web site (even if the retailer never actually sells
any of that product) or supplying via its website any goods to
which a false trade description has been applied by another
party.
It may be possible to escape liability if it can be shown that
reasonable precautions were taken to ensure the accuracy of the
descriptions used. It may also be possible for a supplier or
retailer to rely on a disclaimer. However, these disclaimers must
be bold, precise and reasonable.
They must also be brought to the consumer's attention before or
at the time the consumer reads the description concerned.
Spam
Spamming is the sending of unsolicited commercial e-mail.
The EU Directive on privacy and electronic
communications passed in 2002 provides that spamming will
only be permissible to individuals who have given prior consent to
the receipt of such e-mail. An exception is provided relating to
existing customers, who may be sent the e-mails provided they are
given the opportunity to object to future mailings.
The rules for sending spam to businesses are less restrictive
and essentially require a business to object to such mailings.
Equivalent provisions are yet to be incorporated into UK law.
However, the E-Commerce Regulations require any unsolicited
commercial communication to be clearly identified as such.
Suppliers may, in any event, want to avoid the bad publicity
which is associated with the practice of spamming.
Credit agreements
Businesses providing consumer credit need a licence issued by
the Director General of Fair Trading (renewable every five years).
Consumer credit agreements are those agreement by which a creditor
provides a debtor with credit not exceeding £25,000 (sums in excess
of this amount are dealt with under a different regime). The debtor
must be an individual which, in this case, includes a partnership
but not a company.
The debtor must be given certain information regarding the
proposed transaction including:
- the annual percentage rate of charge (the
APR);
- a comparison of the cash price and the
credit price;
- the total amount payable; and
- cancellation rights.
The agreement must be physically signed by both the debtor and
creditor (or its representative) and cannot be entered into
on-line. If consumer credit agreements are to be offered on-line,
the site should detail the above information and the paperwork
(which should also set out the above information) must be sent to
the individual for their signature on paper.
Failure to comply with these requirements renders the agreement
unenforceable against the debtor (in the absence of a Court Order).
This means that the debtor may be able to keep the property without
having to pay for it.
Summary
Internet retailers are liable to consumers for the quality and
safety of the products purchased. They are also obliged to ensure
that consumers receive specific and accurate information relating
to the retailer and the products it sells.
Written terms of business should be clearly drafted and
incorporated into on-line sales agreements but only represent one
source of a consumer's rights. Certain of these written terms,
particularly those relating to exclusion of the supplier's
liability, may prove to be unenforceable against consumers.
It can be seen from the above that the law gives special
treatment to consumers. Internet suppliers should tailor their
agreements and operations accordingly, in order to minimise the
risk of financial penalties and, in some cases, criminal
liability.
Other useful information on these topics can be found on the web
sites of the Office of Fair
Trading and the Department of
Trade and Industry.
See also:
Any questions? Please contact struan.robertson@out-law.com
/ 0141 249 5422 or one of our other contacts.