Webtrends Tracking Code
 
UK Home >  OUT-LAW News >  News Archive >  2006 >  February 2006 >  Registrars object to VeriSign .com deal

Registrars object to VeriSign .com deal

OUT-LAW News, 16/02/2006

ICANN, the body responsible for the internet’s domain naming system, has been asked to rethink agreements that will settle all pending litigation with VeriSign and hand over control of the .com top-level domain to the domain registry.

In an open letter to Vint Cerf, chairman of ICANN, eight top registrars, including Network Solutions, GoDaddy, Register.com and Melbourne IT, urged the organisation to make critical changes to the agreements, which have already been revised as a result of public comment.

"Unfortunately, the changes do not go to the heart of the matter," says the letter to ICANN's Board. "The agreement still harms the internet community by allowing unjustified price increases in most future years at a time when fees for .com should be decreasing, not rising."

The revised settlement and registry agreements, published by ICANN in January, allow VeriSign to increase the price of domain name registrations by up to 7% in four of the next six years.

VeriSign has also been given a presumptive right to renewal of the .com registry, on the proviso that it complies with clarifications on the use that it may make of traffic data, new service-level specifications for the .com registry, and revised powers of approval granted to ICANN in respect of possible new registry services.

According to the open letter, if these provisions are allowed to stand, then competition in the .com registry will be affected.

VeriSign should be forced to justify any price increases, or have them reviewed, while the renewal of the .com registry should be by means of a competitive rebid of the contract, say the registrars.

They are particularly concerned that VeriSign which, as the .com domain registry controls 85% of the US market, will be locked in as registry operator “without the counterbalance of a competitive bid process”.

“The guarantee of an unregulated monopoly runs counter to the reasons behind why ICANN was created the policies of the anti-trust laws of the United States, and the competition policies of many nations worldwide,” says the letter.

The new arrangements, which are open for public comment until 20th February, have yet to be approved by the ICANN Board.

See: The open letter (3-page / 63KB PDF)

See also:

 

OUT-LAW star: link to the home page
Disclaimer: This was printed from OUT-LAW.COM, a service of international law firm Pinsent Masons. We hope you find this content useful. However, please note that nothing in this document constitutes specific legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. Any questions, please email info@out-law.com.