Webtrends Tracking Code
 
UK Home >  OUT-LAW News >  News Archive >  2006 >  March 2006 >  High Court to hear Apple versus Apple on iTunes

High Court to hear Apple versus Apple on iTunes

OUT-LAW News, 25/03/2006

Apple Computer will take on Apple Corps in the High Court on Wednesday in a dispute over whether the iTunes music service breaches an agreement with the Beatles’ record label and infringes its trade marks.

It is the third time that the two well-known brands have been to court over the computer company’s use of the Apple name.

Advert: Infosecurity Europe, 25-27 April 2006, Olympia, LondonThe first dispute was resolved in 1981, when Apple Computer agreed to pay an undisclosed amount to Apple Corps, and Steve Jobs, head of the computer firm, agreed to restrict the use of the brand he founded to computer products only. Jobs is a Beatles fan – but has never had the rights to sell the band's music on iTunes.

In 1989, Apple Corps again sued Apple Computer, this time over the company's use and sale of music-related software. The case settled in 1991 with a payment of $27 million and another restrictive agreement.

However, in September 2003, Apple Corps filed suit again, over "the use by Apple Computer of the word 'Apple' and apple logos in conjunction with its new application for downloading pre-recorded music from the internet".

That new application – iTunes – has now sold over a billion downloads.

Apple Corps argues that iTunes is in breach of the restrictive agreement between the two companies and infringes upon its trade marks. Apple Computer argues that iTunes is a mechanism allowing “data transmission” and that downloads are permitted in terms of the agreement as they are “data transfers”, according to reports.

The case begins in the High Court tomorrow before Mr Justice Mann who has admitted to being an iPod owner.

See also:

 

OUT-LAW Recommends

Data Protection training
We offer training courses on Data Protection and Freedom of Information laws

Winner at 2008 Webby Awards

OUT-LAW star: link to the home page
Disclaimer: This was printed from OUT-LAW.COM, a service of international law firm Pinsent Masons. We hope you find this content useful. However, please note that nothing in this document constitutes specific legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. Any questions, please email info@out-law.com.