O2,
which is owned by Spain's Telefonica, faces fines of millions of
euros if the Commission finds it guilty of abusing its dominant
market position and charging excessively for roaming.
In 2000 the Commission announced that it would investigate
roaming charges, which are the fees charged by one operator for the
right of customers of a foreign operator to use their mobile
phone.
In 2001 the Commission opened proceedings against operators in
the UK and Germany. In 2004 it wrote to O2 saying that its roaming
charges to other operators had been excessive.
O2 has complained to the Ombudsman, claiming that it was not
granted adequate rights to defend itself. The company says that it
not only was not given proper access to files and information, but
that it was not given enough time to mount a defence.
"The aim of the inquiry is to determine if there has been
maladministration by the Commission," said a statement from the
office of the Ombudsman, Nikiforos Diamandouros. "According to O2,
the Commission did not grant proper rights of defence to the
company in the framework of proceedings against O2. The Ombudsman
has asked the Commission to respond to the company's allegations
before 31 December 2006."
The Ombudsman investigates complaints of maladministration made
by any person or organisation against any European Union body. It
does not have the power to order EU bodies to do anything, but it
can make recommendations. It could not, therefore, order the
Commission to reverse any rulings it made.
The Commission is conducting a campaign against what it sees as
high roaming charges. It has announced its intention to outlaw
roaming charges altogether within the EU. It wants travellers to be
charged the same price for making phone calls abroad as they would
be at home, a move opposed by phone companies.