UK Home >  Legal Info For... >  Insurance and reinsurance >  Insurance regulation >  Age discrimination and insurance

Age discrimination and insurance 


This guide was last updated on 23rd July 2008

In June 2008, the UK Government announced plans to outlaw unjustifiable age discrimination in the provision of goods, facilities and services, including insurance.

The move is part of a complete overhaul of the UK's discrimination laws, which have developed piecemeal over the last 40 years. The Equalities Bill will streamline current legislation into a single Act covering all areas of discrimination, including race, disability, gender, sexual orientation and age.

As part of this process, the Government proposes to broaden the scope of current age discrimination law beyond the workplace to the provision of goods and services. Details of the new rules will be set out in secondary legislation following a consultation exercise planned for 2009. 

The initiative reflects provisions in a new anti-discrimination directive being proposed by the European Commission, which would prohibit direct or indirect discrimination outside the workplace on the grounds of religion or belief, disability or sexual orientation.

Evidence 

The Government has identified healthcare and financial services – particularly insurance - as areas where there is "significant evidence" that age discrimination is taking place. 

Launching the Government's "Framework for a Fairer Future" on 26th June, Harriet Harman, Secretary of State for Women and Equality said:

"Many people still seem to think it's acceptable to discriminate against someone because they are older. It's not. And with the number of people over 85 set to double over the next 20 years – it makes no sense. People are not over the hill at 60 to be either refused insurance or discriminated against in healthcare".

In April 2008, a joint policy briefing by Help the Aged and Age Concern found "extensive evidence that older people experience age discrimination when trying to obtain insurance cover – especially for motor and travel".

The charities' research found that many insurers operate upper age limits for insurance cover, or impose sharp increases in premiums for consumers who are over a certain age, even if there is no increase in risk. The knock-on effect is that older people are dissuaded from travelling, driving or hiring a car or taking part in activities such as voluntary work.

The charities acknowledge that some older people may present an unacceptably high risk, but this is because of their health or their claims history, not because of their age alone. "We do not want to stop insurers making fair commercial decisions, as long as these are not based on arbitrary assumptions about age".

The report also noted that older people are less likely to be able to shop around for the best deal online. According to a 2007 survey by OFCOM, only about 40% of those aged between 65 and 74 have internet access and only about 25% of people over 75. 

Justifiable

The Equalities Bill will not, however, prevent "actuarially justified age-based treatment in areas such as financial services," according to the Framework document. The key issue for insurers is what will be deemed justifiable.

One option is for the rules to follow a similar approach to that taken on the use of gender information.

Under the Sex Discrimination (Amendment) Regulations (which came into force on 6th April this year) insurers can still offer different premiums and benefits to men and women, but only if the difference is based on relevant and accurate actuarial or statistical data compiled, published and regularly updated in accordance with Treasury guidance and the difference in treatment is proportionate.

Some insurers, however, believe new laws are not the answer to age discrimination. Responding to the Framework document on 26th June, Nick Starling, Director of General Insurance and Health at the Association of British Insurers, commented:

"Legislation, no matter how well intentioned, could have the unintended negative consequence of forcing some insurers to withdraw certain products altogether, reducing competition and availability and pushing up prices for all age groups.

"Insurance for older people is available from a range of providers…However we recognise that some people may need more help to find the most appropriate insurance polices for them. We are working to improve this and we know that the Government and age charities will support our efforts in this area."

For the present, the Government has set up a working group of interested parties to consider where age discrimination is taking place in the provision of financial services and the possible impact of legislation. The group will submit a final report by the end of September 2008.

European proposals

On 2nd July 2008, the European Commission adopted a proposal for a new directive aimed at providing protection outside the workplace from discrimination on grounds of age, disability, sexual orientation and religion or belief.  

The draft directive has a broad remit, covering the provision of social services, healthcare, education and housing as well as access to and the supply of goods and services, including insurance.

The proposal, however, includes a special rule for insurance and banking services in recognition of the fact that age or disability can be an essential element in the assessment of risk for certain products and, therefore, the price.

The draft rule provides "in the provision of financial services, member states may permit proportionate differences in treatment where, for the product in question, the use of age or disability is a key factor in the assessment of risk based on relevant and accurate actuarial or statistical data".

CEA, the European insurance and reinsurance federation, welcomed the concession but has concerns that the Commission's proposals will reduce availability and restrict affordability of insurance products.

“The CEA firmly opposes unfair discrimination and supports the EC’s efforts to ensure that all EU citizens are treated fairly,” said CEA Director General Michaela Koller.

"However, if the proposed restrictions are placed on insurance it will have the opposite effect to that which the Commission intends. These legal restrictions on risk-equivalent calculations must be avoided to ensure that insurance pricing is adequate, reasonable and fair.”

The CEA is "strongly in favour of a direct, risk-based exemption for insurance so that a fully integrated and harmonised EU market for insurance is created, ensuring certainty for both consumers and insurance providers".

The Commission's proposal will have to be passed by the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers before it can come into force. Once passed, member states will have two years to implement it into national law.

In the meantime, the Commission says it will be having further discussions with the insurance and banking industries and other relevant stakeholders to obtain a greater understanding of the areas where age or disability are relevant factors in the design and pricing of products.

Contact: Katie Tucker (katie.tucker@pinsentmasons.com / 020 7667 0116)

See: 

See also:

OUT-LAW Recommends

Data Protection training
We offer training courses on Data Protection and Freedom of Information laws

Winner at 2008 Webby Awards

OUT-LAW star: link to the home page
Disclaimer: This was printed from OUT-LAW.COM, a service of international law firm Pinsent Masons. We hope you find this content useful. However, please note that nothing in this document constitutes specific legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. Any questions, please email info@out-law.com.